![]() ![]() Tool for this should be quick, native and simply. And "temporary" soft writing for experiments with undocument libx, hacks, etc.And other soft requiring a performance and light weight.Adware and "legal adware" (with neccessary license agreement). Adware should eat a little CPU time, RAM and disk space and shouldn't require a third-party platform.Driver just will not work if will require a. Also very undesirable to require a few third-party DLLs weighing a few MBs at all. Installer shouldn't require a third-party platform. Where native and third-party independent development is necessary? I just help you orient that language is best for your purposes. Really.Īlso I am not a spammer advertising a commercial product on CodeProject. I do not work for the authors of PB. And, PureBasic is bes t for most native purposes. You can use Delphi, a few C++ implementations, and a few more PLs. Python and Java is better for cross-platform development, not least because not compiling to platform-dependent executable format on many OSes.īut, if you want write native applications, not requiring a third-party dlls and platforms, or native and cross-platform applications, you can't use C#, Java, Python. ![]() C# is more convenient and powerful than PB for writing Windows applications. I don't think that PureBasic better than all of these PLs. I writing in more than 10 PLs including C#, Java, C++ and other main-stream PLs. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |